Business Law 101
Can Actual Innocence Support Compassionate Release? Supreme Court Draws the Line
The Supreme Court ruled that a federal prisoner cannot use compassionate release as a substitute for challenging the...
Dr. David D. Schein examines Tina Peters Sentence Reduced: Was the Punishment Too Harsh? The central issue is what this story says about leadership, incentives and the public's right to expect better judgment from powerful institutions. The episode explains the public stakes, the leadership question and why the issue deserves attention.
In this Saving America episode, Dr. David D. Schein takes up Tina Peters Sentence Reduced: Was the Punishment Too Harsh? The central issue is what this story says about leadership, incentives and the public’s right to expect better judgment from powerful institutions.
Dr. Schein focuses on the decision-makers, the consequences and the gap between public promises and public results.
Dr. Schein follows the incentives, the decision-makers and the public cost of getting the issue wrong.
Viewers following Politics and Public Policy will get a clearer explanation of why this subject matters and how it connects to the broader Dr. Dave Saves America archive.